Tragically, Once Again Self-Driving Cars Aren’t August 28, 2021
Posted by Peter Varhol in Machine Learning, Software development, Technology and Culture, travel.Tags: autonomous vehicles
add a comment
Two stories crossed my attention today that once again, tragically demonstrate that we are likely decades away from self-driving cars, if at all. The first, and stupidest, was with the largest and most arrogant auto company, Toyota, which for some inconceivable reason decided to test-drive its autonomous buses at the Paralympics. One hit an athlete in a legal crosswalk, injuring him and knocking him out of the Games.
Toyota’s CEO posted an apology on YouTube (not even referring to the athlete’s name, which is simply insulting), which is not so much an apology as a brazen PR stunt. I know people who swear by Toyota cars; I swear at them, and this level of arrogance makes it worse. Make it right with the athlete, which Toyota will not do, lest they damage their brand.
The second is, of course, a Tesla, which advertises a “fully autonomous mode” which is anything but. A driver who admits he was not paying attention, instead watching a movie, hit two police cars with lights flashing on the side of the road, attending to another motorist.
Of course, despite the marketing names Tesla gives its driver-assist technology (and that’s really what it is), they have plenty of caveats in the fine print. Those caveats are to keep it out of legal trouble even though the marketing names strongly suggest otherwise. This was the eleventh police car displaying flashing lights that Teslas have hit. While Tesla may end up being a long term success, it is doing itself no favors in the interim.
So what happened to all of the predictions? This is how Anthony Foxx, former U.S. secretary of transportation, envisioned the future of autonomous vehicles in 2016:
“By 2021, we will see autonomous vehicles in operation across the country in ways that we [only] imagine today. … Families will be able to walk out of their homes and call a vehicle, and that vehicle will take them to work or to school. We’re going to see transit systems sharing services with some of these companies.”
Auto executives were no less effusive. Elon Musk is by far the worst of the group. I strongly believe that these so-called predictions were/are criminally wrong, because they encourage people to misuse today’s technology.
I personally believe that fully autonomous vehicles are at least decades away, and possibly completely infeasible.
On Work and Life August 16, 2021
Posted by Peter Varhol in Technology and Culture.Tags: career, moonlight
1 comment so far
A recent Wall Street Journal article (paywall) focused on work from home employees who were actually working two or more full-time jobs, without their employers’ knowledge. Scott Adams actually touched on this topic with a recent Dilbert, which has Wally engaged in two Zoom calls at the same time.
The comments are more interesting than the article. The majority of the comments are negative, and they seem to overwhelmingly come from a certain demographic (to be fair, my demographic). Those of us who came of age in the ’60s and ’70s internalized the righteousness of loyalty to our employer. This was, of course, when many people expected to have 1-2 employers in a career.
That started to fall apart in the 1980s and beyond with massive layoffs, so those that came of age then and later probably have a more cynical viewpoint. The employment contract has changed, and this small number of employees are taking advantage of that. I can’t fault them, though many commenters were aghast, calling it a brazen fraud. But over the last 30 years, you could lose your job at any time, for any reason, so why not have a spare. Even seeming secure jobs could disappear at the loss of a contract, or the capriciousness of management. I have rarely had a job (or in many cases even a company) that lasted more than a few years.
Surely there are a lot of pros and cons here. If they are doing the work expected of them, it seems difficult to find fault. It feels a little bit sleazy, but maybe that’s just my cultural heritage. Many younger workers today are used to the gig economy, where they juggle several projects from different employers.
Those who are doing so make good points. Much of their time is consumed in pointless meetings, so they endeavor to minimize those meetings in order to work more efficiently. If their main employer forces pointless (and yes, many meetings are), meetings, and work that will just be tossed aside, this is a way for employees to fight back. I have some semblance of a moral code, but it never really extended to anything like this.
I moonlighted for much of my career, rarely if ever working on my extracurricular activities from the office, but spending plenty of evening and weekend time on it. My employers (or at least my manager) generally knew, although certainly no one made a big deal out of it (well, one did). But almost all thought it best to remain quiet about my outside gigs. Those gigs were highly visible in the industry, and could have brought credit upon my employers, if they cared. They didn’t, so I did them anyway.
So I’m not sure this is wrong in many ways. I feel for those who are in their early careers, perhaps already laid off several times, who are striving for the semblance of a real career (don’t feel bad; I didn’t have a real career). I think they are the ones who can look the Man in the eye and give him the finger.
I Can Get to Europe Next Month; Can I Get Back Again? August 4, 2021
Posted by Peter Varhol in travel.Tags: COVID, Swiss Testing Day, travel, vaccination
1 comment so far
I am speaking at Swiss Testing Day in Zurich on September 14th. They seem to be bound and determined to hold an in-person conference, even with the rise of the Delta variant and the next wave of Covid.
I haven’t made any reservations yet. But I have been researching requirements for travel. First, the good news. Because I am fully vaccinated, it appears Switzerland will accept me. But I’m a little leery of that; because of the strange attitude in the US toward vaccine passports, my proof is my vaccine cards (I have two, one for each shot), which are hardly positive identification.
It’s also a little problematic because Switzerland is not part of the EU, but is a member of Schengen, the larger aviation consortium. But it looks like I can transit Amsterdam Schiphol (the Netherlands itself is not accepting Americans), as long as I stay airside.
Getting back is another story. Even with vaccination, anyone coming into the US (only on an airplane) is required to have a negative Covid test within three days of departure. Not 72 hours, but three days (don’t ask).
My problem here was that I had no idea where to get tested in Zurich. Some research informed me that the Swiss, efficient people that they are, are offering testing at the airport, before you leave. I am a little hesitant about getting a test shortly before I get on the airplane; what happens if it comes up positive?
But what kind of test do I need? The explanation is dense, but I think (emphasis on think) a rapid antigen test will suffice. The airport clinic says that the turnaround time for this type of test is about 20 minutes, which means that it can be done just prior to departure. The more comprehensive PCR test returns in about five hours.
And, of course, everything or anything can change in the next six weeks.
And then I get to do the same thing two weeks later to go to Serbia.



