jump to navigation

Do We Want Tech Companies Running Our Towns? March 6, 2021

Posted by Peter Varhol in Strategy, Technology and Culture.
Tags: , ,
1 comment so far

I was born and raised in a company town.  That meant that a company bought thousands of acres of land, constructed a major company or plant, and built most or all of the homes and businesses within its borders.  When I was growing up, the largest retail operation was the company store (yes, where we owed our soul), a six-story building just off of Franklin Avenue.  The neighborhoods were organized as plans, built as needed to supply workers, and hundreds of houses were rented out to workers who came to work the mill.

But this concept gives an entirely new meaning to the idea of the company town.  the governor of Nevada, Steve Sisolak, announced a plan to launch “Innovation Zones” to attract technology firms. The zones would permit companies to form governments carrying the same authority as counties, including the ability to impose taxes, form school districts and courts and provide government services.

In one sense, it’s an intriguing idea.  Can tech companies do a better job than local governments?  It might be interesting to find out.  But it’s got a bunch of problems, both philosophical and practical.  From a practical standpoint, technology firms simply don’t have the infrastructure that were needed by factories and mines of a century ago.  They tend to focus on their business, not on running municipalities, and except for the very largest don’t have the resources to do so.

From a philosophical standpoint, governments stand legally and ethically accountable to the people.  I realize that this accountability is often imperfect, but I can’t imagine that a company dedicated to business really cares about serving a larger community.

But here’s really the biggest problem.  My home town, Aliquippa, reached a population of 27,000 during the heyday of the steel mill.  In the 1980s, the steel mill cratered as the steel industry underwent economic shifts.  I remember flying over it in the mid-1990s, coming into Pittsburgh airport, and amazed at the six-mile sandbar along the river where the steel mill once thrived. Today the population of Aliquippa is about 9000, with all of the economic and personal devastation you might imagine.

Tech companies are even more fleeting.  As a young adult in the Boston area, companies such as Wang Laboratories, Digital Equipment Corporation, and Data General all flourished in the 1980s and employed tens of thousands of people (in DEC’s case, well over 100,000 at its height).  Today, all have been out of business since the 1990s.  I can envision, maybe, getting a tech company enthused about starting and running a municipality, for maybe a few years, but I fail to see any level of ability or commitment to do so for a century or more.  In some cases, companies have promised to invest in existing communities or to provide a set number of jobs in return for tax breaks, but rarely deliver on those agreements.

So this is a bad idea.  I hope Nevada comes to its senses.

Can Amazon Replace Libraries? July 23, 2018

Posted by Peter Varhol in Education, Technology and Culture.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

I was born and raised in Aliquippa, Pennsylvania.  It was a company town.  In 1905, the Jones and Laughlin Steel Corporation bought a tract of several thousand acres along the steep hills of the Ohio River, laid out some streets, built some houses and stores, and constructed a steel mill stretching six miles along the river.

The neighborhoods were called plans, because they were individual neighborhood plans conceived and built by the company.  My older sister grew up in the projects of Plan 11.  Football Hall of Fame running back Tony Dorsett, two years my elder, grew up just a couple of blocks away.  We shopped in the company store, the largest building in town, until I was 13.  (Bear with me, please)

B.F. Jones, in the style of the robber barons of an earlier era, built a grand library in his name, right along Franklin Avenue, the main street, all marble and columns, called the B.F. (for Burris Frederick) Jones Memorial Library.

It was a massive marble structure that frightened off most youngsters.  The homeless guy slept at a table in one corner.  In that library, I read Don Quixote, The Far Pavilions, just about everything from James Michener, Irving Stone, and much more.  It was a dismal company town, but I escaped through the library far beyond the boundaries of the drab community.

Today, a yanked Forbes magazine op-ed written by LIU Post economist Panos Mourdoukoutas opined that libraries were obsolete, and that they should be replaced by for-profit brick-and-mortar Amazon stores selling physical books.  Libraries are no longer relevant, Mourdoukoutas and Forbes claim, and Amazon can serve the need in a for-profit way that benefits everyone.  Libraries are a waste of taxpayer funds.

Funny, today, 40 years later, my adopted town library is the hangout of middle and high school students.  Rather than the quiet place of reflection (and possibly stagnation) of the past, it is a vibrant, joyful place where parents are happy to see their children study together and socialize.  There are movies, crafts, classes, lectures, and games.  In an era where youngsters can escape to their phones, the Internet, video games, drugs, or worse, escaping to the library is a worthy goal.

There is one Starbucks in town, where Mourdoukoutas tells us that anyone can get wifi, and most people use the drive-through.  I doubt they would let the throngs of youngsters cavort for the evening like the library does.

Today I travel extensively.  I am enthralled by the amazing architectures of European cities, built when society was much poorer.  Yet today we cannot afford libraries?

I am sorry, I call bullshit.  Long and loud.  This type of trash deserves no serious discussion; in fact, no discussion whatsoever.  If we cannot afford libraries, we cannot afford imagination, we cannot afford, well, life.

To reinforce the point, please invest a few minutes to listen to Jimmy Buffett, Love in the Library.  Thank you.